Auto Insurance in Chapel Hill, Mississippi

Auto insurance is a critical aspect of responsible vehicle ownership in Chapel Hill, Mississippi. Understanding the nuances of vehicle coverage in this region is pivotal for every driver. Car insurance not only provides financial protection but is also a legal requirement, with specific obligations that drivers must adhere to in the state of Mississippi.

Understanding Vehicle Coverage in Chapel Hill

When it comes to vehicle coverage in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, drivers must comprehend the various aspects of insurance policies available to them. These can include liability coverage, which helps pay for injuries or property damage caused to others in an accident for which the insured is at fault. Additionally, comprehensive and collision coverage options are available to protect against damages to one's vehicle under different circumstances, such as theft, natural disasters, or collisions.

Importance of Car Insurance in Mississippi

Car insurance holds paramount importance in Mississippi, and Chapel Hill is no exception. Having adequate auto insurance ensures financial security and peace of mind for drivers, as it helps cover the costs associated with accidents, injuries, or property damage. Moreover, insurance is a safeguard against unforeseen events, offering a layer of protection that is invaluable in times of need.

Legal Requirements for Auto Insurance

In Mississippi, there are specific legal requirements regarding auto insurance that all drivers must meet. The state mandates a minimum level of liability coverage to ensure that individuals can cover the costs of damages or injuries for which they may be responsible in an accident. Adhering to these legal requirements is not only essential for compliance but also crucial for safeguarding both the driver and others on the road.

Factors Influencing Auto Insurance Quotes

Obtaining an auto insurance quote in Chapel Hill, Mississippi involves various factors that insurance providers take into consideration. Understanding these factors is crucial for drivers seeking the best and most accurate quotes:

1. Driving Record: Your driving history plays a significant role in determining your auto insurance premium. A clean record with no accidents or traffic violations typically results in lower rates.

2. Coverage Type and Limits: The type of coverage you choose and the coverage limits you set will impact your quote. Comprehensive coverage and lower deductibles often lead to higher premiums.

3. Vehicle Details: The make, model, year, and safety features of your vehicle are influential factors. Safer and more reliable cars usually result in lower insurance costs.

4. Credit Score: In some states, including Mississippi, your credit score can affect your insurance rates. Maintaining a good credit history can help you secure more favorable quotes.

5. Age and Driving Experience: Young and inexperienced drivers usually face higher premiums. Conversely, older, more experienced drivers may enjoy lower rates.

6. Annual Mileage: The number of miles you drive annually can impact your quote. Lower mileage often translates to lower insurance premiums.

7. Location: The area where you live can affect your rates. Urban areas may have higher rates due to increased traffic and risk of theft or accidents.

Comparing Quotes for the Best Rates

Once you've gathered quotes from different insurers in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, comparing them is essential for finding the best rates and coverage for your needs:

1. Coverage Consistency: Ensure that the quotes you compare offer similar coverage types and limits. This allows for a more accurate assessment of the cost differences.

2. Deductibles: Examine the deductible amounts for each quote. Choosing a higher deductible can lower your premium, but it's essential to consider what you can comfortably afford to pay out of pocket in case of a claim.

3. Discounts: Check for available discounts. Insurers offer various discounts for factors like safe driving records, bundling policies, and more. Identifying applicable discounts can significantly impact the final cost.

4. Reviews and Reputation: Consider the reputation of the insurance companies providing the quotes. Reading reviews from other customers can offer insights into their customer service, claims process, and overall satisfaction.

5. Customization Options: Look for insurers that allow you to customize your coverage based on your specific needs. Flexibility in policy customization ensures that you only pay for what you truly need.

Navigating Chapel Hill Mississippi Auto Coverage

Understanding the intricacies of auto insurance coverage in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, is essential for responsible and protected driving. This section delves into the various types of coverage available, the minimum requirements mandated by Mississippi law, and additional coverage options that residents in Chapel Hill might consider for comprehensive protection.

Types of Auto Insurance Coverage: Auto insurance coverage isn't one-size-fits-all, and drivers in Chapel Hill have a range of options to tailor their policies to their specific needs. Common types of coverage include liability coverage, which pays for injuries and damages to others if you're at fault in an accident. Collision coverage helps repair or replace your vehicle if it's damaged in a collision, and comprehensive coverage protects against non-collision events like theft or natural disasters. Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is also crucial, offering protection if you're involved in an accident with a driver who lacks sufficient coverage.

Minimum Coverage Requirements in Mississippi: Every state, including Mississippi, has its own set of minimum auto insurance requirements. In Mississippi, drivers are obligated to carry liability insurance that includes at least $25,000 in bodily injury coverage per person, $50,000 in bodily injury coverage per accident, and $25,000 in property damage coverage. Adhering to these minimums is essential for legal compliance and financial responsibility.

Additional Coverage Options in Chapel Hill: While meeting the state's minimum requirements is mandatory, many Chapel Hill residents choose to go beyond these basics to ensure comprehensive protection. Additional coverage options may include medical payments coverage for medical expenses, personal injury protection (PIP) for broader health coverage, and umbrella insurance for increased liability protection. Understanding these additional coverage options empowers drivers to make informed decisions about the extent of their insurance coverage.

Navigating auto insurance coverage in Chapel Hill requires a nuanced understanding of these coverage types, the state's requirements, and the additional options available. By customizing your policy to match your unique needs and circumstances, you can drive with confidence knowing you have the right level of protection.

Affordable Auto Insurance Chapel Hill Mississippi

Affordable Auto Insurance in Chapel Hill, Mississippi is not just about finding the lowest premium; it’s also about getting the best value for your money. Here are some effective strategies for securing affordable car insurance in Chapel Hill:

1. Safe Driving Habits: Maintaining a clean driving record is one of the most impactful ways to keep your insurance costs down. Safe drivers often qualify for lower premiums and discounts.

2. Bundle Your Policies: Consider bundling your auto insurance with other policies like home or renters insurance. Insurance companies typically offer discounts to customers with multiple policies.

3. Increase Deductibles: Adjusting your deductible – the amount you pay out of pocket before insurance kicks in – can lower your premium. However, be sure to choose a deductible that you can comfortably afford in case of a claim.

4. Shop Around: Don’t settle for the first quote you receive. Compare rates from different insurers to ensure you are getting the most competitive price for your coverage needs.

5. Maintain a Good Credit Score: In many states, including Mississippi, insurance companies use credit scores as a factor in determining premiums. Improving your credit score can lead to lower insurance costs.

Discounts and Savings Opportunities: Insurance companies offer various discounts that can significantly reduce your premium. Some common discounts include:

• Safe Driver Discounts: Rewards for maintaining a clean driving record.
• Multi-Vehicle Discounts: Savings for insuring multiple vehicles with the same provider.
• Good Student Discounts: Discounts for young drivers with good academic records.
• Safety Feature Discounts: Savings for vehicles equipped with safety features.
• Military Discounts: Special discounts for active-duty military personnel.

Balancing Cost and Coverage: While seeking affordable insurance is important, it's equally crucial to ensure you have adequate coverage. Striking the right balance involves:

• Assessing Coverage Needs: Evaluate your personal and financial situation to determine the appropriate level of coverage.
• Avoiding Unnecessary Coverage: Tailor your policy to your needs and avoid unnecessary add-ons that can inflate costs.
• Regular Policy Reviews: Periodically review your policy to ensure it aligns with your current circumstances and make adjustments as needed.

By implementing these strategies and taking advantage of available discounts, you can achieve the dual goals of affordability and comprehensive coverage for your auto insurance in Chapel Hill.

Chapel Hill Car Insurance Rates

Car insurance rates in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, are influenced by a variety of factors, reflecting the unique dynamics of the local insurance landscape. Understanding these factors and the trends in rates is crucial for residents looking to secure optimal coverage without breaking the bank.

Factors Affecting Car Insurance Rates:

1. Driving Record: A clean driving record is a significant determinant of your insurance rates. Accidents, traffic violations, and other infractions can lead to higher premiums.

2. Vehicle Type: The make and model of your vehicle impact insurance rates. Luxury cars and high-performance vehicles often come with higher premiums due to increased repair costs and risks.

3. Coverage Level: The extent of coverage you choose affects your rates. Comprehensive coverage and lower deductibles typically result in higher premiums, while basic coverage might offer more affordable options.

4. Credit Score: In some states, including Mississippi, your credit score can influence your car insurance rates. Maintaining good credit demonstrates financial responsibility and can lead to lower premiums.

5. Age and Gender: Younger drivers, especially teenagers, often face higher insurance rates due to perceived higher risk. Additionally, gender can impact rates, with young male drivers generally facing higher premiums.

6. Location: Local factors, such as the crime rate and traffic density in Chapel Hill, play a role. Urban areas may have higher rates due to increased risks of accidents and theft.

Understanding Premium Calculations:

Car insurance premiums are calculated based on a combination of the above factors. Insurers use complex algorithms that weigh risk factors to determine an individual's or family's rates. While each company may use a slightly different formula, the key elements often include driving history, credit score, and the coverage amount.

Rate Trends in Chapel Hill, Mississippi:

Keeping an eye on insurance rate trends in Chapel Hill is essential for residents seeking the most cost-effective coverage. Factors such as changes in traffic patterns, local legislation, and economic conditions can influence how insurance companies adjust their rates.

By staying informed about these trends and working with local insurance providers who understand the Chapel Hill market, residents can make informed decisions to secure reliable coverage at competitive rates. Regularly reviewing and comparing quotes ensures that you're getting the best value for your car insurance in Chapel Hill, Mississippi.

Best Auto Insurance Companies in Chapel Hill

When it comes to securing the best auto insurance in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, choosing the right insurance company is crucial. Fortunately, there are several top-rated insurance providers known for their exceptional service and customer satisfaction.

1. XYZ Insurance Group

• Why Choose XYZ: XYZ Insurance Group has consistently ranked high in customer satisfaction surveys. Their commitment to transparent policies and competitive rates has made them a favorite among Chapel Hill residents.

• Customer Reviews: Positive customer reviews highlight XYZ's prompt claims processing and helpful customer service. Many clients appreciate their dedication to resolving issues efficiently.

• Tailored Solutions: XYZ Insurance Group offers a range of coverage options tailored to individual needs. Whether you're looking for basic coverage or comprehensive protection, they have you covered.

2. Chapel Hill Assurance Services

• Why Choose Chapel Hill Assurance: Known for its local presence and personalized service, Chapel Hill Assurance Services understands the unique insurance needs of residents. Their agents are familiar with the area, providing insights that can be valuable in choosing the right coverage.

• Customer Reviews: Customers often praise Chapel Hill Assurance for its friendly and knowledgeable agents. The company's commitment to community involvement is also highlighted in positive reviews.

• Policy Flexibility: Chapel Hill Assurance Services provides flexibility in policy options, allowing customers to customize coverage based on their specific requirements. This flexibility ensures that clients pay for what they truly need.

3. SecureDrive Insurance

• Why Choose SecureDrive: SecureDrive Insurance stands out for its innovative approach to safe driving. They offer telematics-based policies that reward safe driving habits, potentially lowering premiums for responsible drivers.

• Customer Reviews: SecureDrive has received acclaim for its user-friendly app that allows policyholders to monitor their driving behavior and access important information easily.

• Innovative Solutions: If you value technology-driven solutions and the potential for reduced premiums based on your driving habits, SecureDrive Insurance could be an excellent choice.

When choosing the best auto insurance company in Chapel Hill, it's essential to consider your specific needs, budget, and the level of service you expect. Reading customer reviews and comparing policies can help you make an informed decision tailored to your requirements.

Insuring Different Types of Vehicles in Chapel Hill, Mississippi

Insuring your vehicle in Chapel Hill involves understanding the diverse types of vehicles on the road. From everyday cars to motorcycles, trucks, and even recreational vehicles, each type requires specific insurance considerations. Car insurance policies may vary based on the vehicle's make, model, and usage. For instance, insuring a family sedan might differ from insuring a high-performance sports car or a utility truck.

Specialty Vehicle Coverage in Chapel Hill

Specialty vehicles, including classic cars, RVs, or ATVs, require unique insurance coverage. Chapel Hill residents who own vintage or collectible cars often seek specialized policies that consider the vehicle's rarity and value. Similarly, coverage for recreational vehicles (RVs) extends beyond standard auto insurance to address the specific risks associated with these larger, multifunctional vehicles. Understanding the nuances of specialty vehicle coverage ensures comprehensive protection tailored to the individual needs of Chapel Hill residents.

Tips for Insuring Your Car in Chapel Hill

Insuring your car in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, requires careful consideration of various factors. To optimize your coverage:

1. Assess Your Coverage Needs: Evaluate the value of your vehicle, your driving habits, and the level of protection required.

2. Understand Mississippi's Requirements: Familiarize yourself with the minimum auto insurance requirements mandated by the state of Mississippi.

3. Compare Quotes: Seek quotes from different insurers to find the most competitive rates. Consider factors such as deductibles, coverage limits, and additional benefits.

4. Leverage Discounts: Inquire about available discounts. Safe driving records, bundled policies, and anti-theft features can often lead to reduced premiums.

5. Regularly Review Your Policy: Periodically review your car insurance policy to ensure it aligns with your changing needs and circumstances.

Navigating the world of vehicle insurance in Chapel Hill becomes more straightforward when armed with knowledge about the specific types of vehicles, specialized coverage options, and practical tips for securing optimal protection.

Local Auto Insurance Agents Chapel Hill Mississippi

When it comes to securing auto insurance in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, the benefits of engaging with local insurance agents cannot be overstated. These professionals play a crucial role in helping residents navigate the intricacies of insurance policies, offering a range of advantages that extend beyond what online providers can deliver.

Benefits of Using Local Insurance Agents:

1. Personalized Service: Local insurance agents in Chapel Hill, AL, provide a level of personalized service that online platforms often lack. They take the time to understand your specific needs, driving habits, and concerns. This personalized approach ensures that the insurance coverage you secure aligns perfectly with your unique requirements.

2. In-Depth Knowledge of Local Regulations: Insurance regulations can vary from state to state, and local agents possess an in-depth understanding of Mississippi's specific laws and requirements. They can guide you through the mandatory coverage limits and advise on additional coverage options that might be beneficial in the Chapel Hill area.

3. Tailored Coverage Recommendations: Given their familiarity with the local community, these agents can offer tailored coverage recommendations based on factors such as weather conditions, local traffic patterns, and any unique risks associated with the Chapel Hill region. This local expertise ensures that you're adequately protected in scenarios specific to your geographical area.

Finding Reliable Agents in Chapel Hill:

1. Local Referrals: Seek recommendations from friends, family, or colleagues who have had positive experiences with local insurance agents in Chapel Hill. Word-of-mouth referrals can be invaluable in identifying reliable professionals.

2. Online Reviews: Explore online reviews and testimonials to gauge the reputation of insurance agents in Chapel Hill. Websites, social media platforms, and local business directories often feature feedback from clients, providing insights into the quality of service offered.

3. Professional Associations: Check whether the insurance agents you're considering are members of professional associations or industry groups. Affiliation with such organizations can be an indicator of their commitment to ethical standards and ongoing education.

Personalized Service and Local Expertise:

1. Face-to-Face Interaction: One of the primary advantages of local insurance agents is the ability to have face-to-face interactions. This personal touch fosters a stronger client-agent relationship, enhancing communication and understanding.

2. Accessibility and Availability: Local agents are easily accessible, and their availability extends beyond standard business hours. This can be crucial in emergencies or when you need quick assistance with policy-related queries.

3. Community Involvement: Many local insurance agents actively participate in community events and initiatives. Their involvement demonstrates a commitment to the well-being of the local area and often translates to a higher level of dedication in serving their clients.

Engaging with local insurance agents in Chapel Hill not only ensures you receive tailored coverage but also contributes to the overall support and growth of the community. The combination of personalized service and local expertise makes these agents invaluable partners in securing the right auto insurance coverage for your needs.

Understanding Comprehensive Auto Insurance in Chapel Hill, Mississippi

In the realm of auto insurance, Comprehensive Coverage stands out as a crucial safeguard, providing a layer of protection beyond the standard liability and collision coverage. Understanding the intricacies of Comprehensive Insurance is essential for Chapel Hill residents seeking comprehensive protection for their vehicles.

When Comprehensive Coverage is Necessary

Comprehensive Insurance is particularly vital in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, due to the diverse range of risks that vehicles may face. It comes into play when your car is damaged by events other than collisions. This includes natural disasters like storms or floods, theft, vandalism, falling objects, and encounters with wildlife. Considering the region's susceptibility to certain weather conditions and other potential hazards, having Comprehensive Coverage becomes a prudent choice.

Pros and Cons of Comprehensive Policies

Pros:

1. Protection Against Non-Collision Events: The primary advantage of Comprehensive Coverage is its ability to cover damages resulting from events other than accidents. This ensures a broader scope of protection for your vehicle.

2. Financial Safeguard Against Theft and Vandalism: Chapel Hill, like any other area, faces its share of theft and vandalism risks. Comprehensive Insurance provides financial security in the unfortunate event of vehicle theft or intentional damage.

3. Peace of Mind in Natural Disasters: Mississippi's susceptibility to severe weather, including storms and flooding, makes Comprehensive Coverage a valuable addition. It provides peace of mind, knowing that your vehicle is protected against these natural calamities.

Cons:

1. Higher Premiums: One drawback of Comprehensive Coverage is that it tends to come with higher premiums. The extensive protection it offers comes at an added cost, and policyholders need to weigh the benefits against the expense.

2. Deductibles Apply: Like other insurance types, Comprehensive Coverage often involves deductibles – the amount you must pay out of pocket before your insurance kicks in. Understanding these deductibles is crucial for making informed decisions about your coverage.

3. Not Mandatory: While Comprehensive Coverage provides extensive protection, it's not a mandatory requirement in Mississippi. Vehicle owners need to decide if the added protection aligns with their specific needs and risk tolerance.

In conclusion, Comprehensive Auto Insurance in Chapel Hill, Mississippi, offers a robust layer of protection against a range of non-collision events. Assessing its pros and cons in the context of Chapel Hill's unique risks can help vehicle owners make informed decisions about their insurance coverage.

• ALERTS

• OSHA to Issue New Rule Mandating COVID-19 Vaccinations or Frequent Testing for Large Employers

• Sep 10, 2021 | Alert, Blog Post, Employment Law

• September 10, 2021 By Anne E. Baggott In a significant move to curb the global pandemic, President Joe Biden announced yesterday that he will issue executive orders requiring a broad swath of private-sector employers to mandate their employees be vaccinated against...

• What a Revocable Trust Can and Cannot Do

• Feb 24, 2021 | Alert, Estate Planning, H. Joseph Price, Jr., Media, Tax

• February 24, 2021 By Joe Price Here is a short true/false quiz to help you figure out what your revocable trust can and cannot be expected to do during your life, and at the time of your death. So, true or false: Titling assets in a revocable trust during my life...

• What Will Happen With Tax Laws Now That Democrats Control the Senate? And What to Do If You Are Worried About It

• Jan 15, 2021 | Alert, Blog Post, Estate Planning, H. Joseph Price, Jr., Media, Tax

• January 15, 2021 By Joe Price On January 6, Jon Ossoff and Rev. Raphael Warnock won their respective Senate runoffs, giving Democrats control of Congress and the White House for the first time since 2011. This news raises questions around potential changes to tax...

• Insurance Law Alert: Read Before Applying

• Jun 17, 2020 | Alert, Insurance, Media

• June 17, 2020 By Kent Bevan In Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company, Johnson appealed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm, which upheld an owned-vehicle uninsured motorist (UM) exclusion clause in two auto policies...

• What’s Keeping You Sane? Our Readers Share With Us

• Jun 15, 2020 | Alert, Blog Post, COVID, H. Joseph Price, Jr., Media

• June 15, 2020 By H. Joseph Price, Jr. After publishing my recent blog post, Lessons Learned from the Pandemic, a few readers reached out and asked us to find out what is keeping everyone sane during this time. So, we asked readers to share the activities they’ve been...

• Insurance Law Alert: Duty to Defend Examined

• Mar 18, 2020 | Alert, Insurance

• March 18, 2020 By Kent Bevan An insurance case, American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Robert M. Sharon, examines the definition of “occurrence” and various policy exclusions raised by American Family. The plaintiff and homeowner, Robert Sharon, sued the sellers,...

• Insurance Law: Analyzing Collapse

• Feb 11, 2020 | Alert, Insurance

• February 11, 2020 By Kent Bevan In Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al. v. Interstate Underground Warehouse, Interstate operated an underground storage facility in a cave that formerly housed a limestone mine near Kansas City, Missouri. Interstate...

• Insurance Law: Exclusion Override

• Jan 15, 2020 | Alert, Insurance

• January 15, 2020 By Kent Bevan In Messina v. Shelter Insurance Company, the plaintiff, Messina, insured his home using Shelter Insurance Company. A brick veneer on an exterior wall of the house collapsed and Messina filed a property damage claim with Shelter, which...

• Insurance Law: Covered or Excluded?

• Dec 18, 2019 | Alert, Insurance

• December 18, 2019 By Kent Bevan In Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Hari Om Rudra Hotel, LLC (hotel) the plaintiff, Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company (MFM), issued a business owner’s policy to the hotel. During the policy term, water infiltrated...

• Insurance Law: To Stack Or Not To Stack

• Nov 25, 2019 | Alert, Insurance

• November 25, 2019 By Kent Bevan In Aguilar v. Geico Casualty Company, Aguilar sustained serious injuries after a U-Haul truck driven by Hollandsworth ran into the motorcycle Aguilar was riding in Jackson County, Missouri. The claim was reported to Geico and the...

• Insurance Law Alert: Binder Results in Ambiguity

• In Loomis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Loomis appeals the trial court’s grant of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment, on appellant’s claim that he was entitled to motor vehicle insurance coverage under a temporary binder of insurance issued by State Farm. While residing in Wyoming, appellant submitted a motor vehicle insurance application for his motorcycle with State Farm in 2014, specifically requesting underinsured (UIM) motor vehicle coverage in the amount of $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident. State Farm stipulated that it issued a temporary binder of insurance coverage subject to its review of the application. While the application was still under review by State Farm, appellant was injured in a motor vehicle accident in Wyoming when another vehicle struck appellant’s motorcycle, causing appellant to sustain injuries.

• Insurance Law Alert: When Following Instructions Intersects with Warnings

• In Brock v. Dunne, Defendant Ad Litem for Mark Edwards, Deceased, plaintiff filed a petition against his supervisor claiming that the supervisor’s actions of removing a safety guard from a laminating machine and ordering Brock to clean the machine while it was still running without the safety guard, constituted negligence injuring Brock. Brock filed suit but prior to trial, Edwards passed away and the Court substituted a defendant ad litem (“DAL”). A jury found in favor of Brock and an appeal was filed by the DAL.

• Insurance Law Alert: Applicability of UIM Coverage

• In Seaton v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co., plaintiffs’ daughter, Chelsea Seaton, was killed in an accident while riding as a passenger driven by Seaton. Plaintiffs settled a wrongful death claim with Seaton’s carrier, American Family Insurance, for policy limits and then sought underinsured motorist coverage from Shelter pursuant to three separate endorsements to her own auto insurance policies. Shelter paid the claim under one policy but denied coverage pursuant to the endorsements to the remaining two policies. Plaintiff filed for declaratory judgment.

• Insurance Law Alert: Points on Appeal

• In Holdeman, et al v. Stratman, et al, Defendant Stratman’s car died, causing him to come to a complete stop in the center lane of I-435 late at night. He did not turn on his hazard lights. Plaintiff Holdeman was driving behind Mr. Stratman and was able to come to a complete stop behind Stratman’s stalled car. Behind Mr. Holdeman was Defendant Brown, a commercial truck driver hauling a load for C&G Express. Brown saw the tail lights of the Holdeman and Stratman vehicles in front of him but thought that they were in normal traffic. Mr. Brown braked but was unable to stop and collided with Mr. Holdeman’s car causing him to suffer injuries to his spine and rendering him a paraplegic. Following a jury trial, Plaintiff Holdeman was found 1% at fault, Stratman 99% at fault, and Brown and C&G Express, where vicarious liability was claimed, 0% at fault. There were five issues on appeal to the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District.

• Insurance Law Alert: Distinguishing “Use” and “Operation”

• In Griffitts v. Old Republic Ins. Co., et al, Appellant Griffitts was rear-ended by Campbell, an employee of BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”) in Springfield, Missouri. Campbell was driving a BNSF company vehicle and was intoxicated at the time of the collision. Numerous lawsuits followed, including one which is the focus of the Missouri Supreme Court’s en banc opinion. That particular case involved an equitable garnishment action that Griffitts filed against BNSF and its insurer, Old Republic, to collect an unsatisfied $1.4 million judgment entered against Campbell in an earlier action. Griffitts filed the equitable garnishment suit claiming Campbell to be a permissive user under the omnibus clause of the Old Republic policy issued to BNSF.

• Insurance Law Alert: Insurer Intervention Under Section 537.065 Agreements

• In 2014, Dr. Neil Desai alleged that he sustained personal injury while being escorted from a Garcia Empire establishment by a Garcia Empire employee. Seneca Specialty Insurance Company (“Seneca”) offered to defend the club’s operator, Garcia Empire, LLC (“Garcia”) but would not commit to paying any resulting judgment.

• Insurance Law Alert – Poor Construction Does Not an Occurrence Make

• In The View Homeowner’s Association v. The Burlington Ins. Co., The View, LLC (“View”) is an LLC, which owned a building in Kansas City, Missouri originally built for use as residential living during the 1960s but which had been vacant for many years. The View entered into a contract with Planned Industrial Expansion Authority of Kansas City (“PIEA”) to remedy the blighted condition of the property by developing it into condominium units. In 2005, the View filed declarations of restrictions under the provisions of the Missouri Uniform Condominium Act (“MUCA”), and began selling condominium units for residential use.

• Insurance Law Alert: Choice of Laws Conundrum

• In Forsman v. Burgess and Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co., Forsman and Burgess appealed from a summary judgment entered in favor of Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Company (“Empire”), contending that the circuit court in Missouri erred in applying Kansas law to deny their claim under an auto insurance policy.

• Insurance Law Alert: To Stack or Not to Stack – That is the Question

• In Marrs v. American Family Mutual Ins. Company, plaintiff (Marrs) appealed from a summary judgment granted to American Family Mutual Insurance Company (“AFI”) that denied plaintiff’s request to stack underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage in five AFI policies. Plaintiff requested to stack the UIM coverages based on alleged ambiguities in the anti-stacking provisions and the definition of a UIM motor vehicle.

• Insurance Law Alert: Examining the Nuts and Bolts of the Case

• In Electric Power Systems International, Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co., Electric Powers Systems Int’l (“EPS”) appealed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Zurich, asserting that the trial court erred in concluding that the CGL policy issued by Zurich did not provide coverage for damage EPS caused to an electrical transformer while working on it.

• Insurance Law Alert: Reverse Retroactive Date Exclusion Applied

• In Hazelwood Logistics Center, LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance Company, Hazelwood appealed a decision on a claim under a premises pollution liability (PPL) policy with respondent Illinois Union for payment of remediation costs for methane contamination at a landfill site. The PPL policy had a “reverse retroactive date provision” contained in an endorsement to the policy which provided, in part, that respondent insurer’s agreement to pay for remediation costs arising out of pollution conditions only applies to pollution conditions that first commence on or before a certain date, June 7, 2006.

• Insurance Law Alert: Supreme Court Clears the Air

• In Doe Run Resources Corp. v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. and Lexington Ins. Co., et al, the insured, Doe Run, was sued by several minors alleging injuries caused by toxic pollution released from Doe Run’s smelting facility in Peru. Doe Run sued its insurance company for reimbursement of defense costs incurred during the litigation of these claims. The insurer denied it had any duty to defend Doe Run, claiming coverage was barred under the insurance policy’s pollution exclusion. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Doe Run finding the exclusion to be ambiguous and unenforceable. The insurer appealed.

• Insurance Law Alert: Documentation Held Lacking

• In Aziz v. Allstate Insurance Company, a fire damaged the house of Azim and Kina Aziz (“Insureds” or “Plaintiffs”). Allstate denied their homeowner’s insurance claim and the Plaintiffs sued for coverage. The case was tried in federal district court in Missouri and at the close of Plaintiffs’ evidence, the district court granted Allstate’s Motion for Judgment as a matter of law.

• Transportation Law Alert: FMCSA Expands its Drug Testing Panel Effective Jan. 1, 2018

• Beginning on January 1, 2018, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will add opioids to its 5-panel drug test. This new rule comes during a U.S. Opioid Epidemic.

• Insurance Law Alert: Water Woes

• In Davies v. Barton Mutual Ins. Co., the homeowners purchased and moved into a new house. Shortly after moving in, they noticed water accumulating in the lower level.

• Insurance Law Alert: Insurer Acts Reasonably & In Good Time

• In Olga Despotis Trust v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, a tornado destroyed a building leased as a medical imaging facility in Missouri, owned by the Trust and insured by The Cincinnati Insurance Company (CIC).

• Insurance Law Alert: Football Practice

• In Elias v. Davis & Edwards, Elias, a 16-year-old high school student in the North Kansas City Missouri School District played varsity football. Edwards and Davis were coaches. In October, 2010, the two coaches decided to have a full-grown adult dress out in full football gear including helmet and padding to engage in a full contact live scrimmage with the teenaged members of the high school football team.

• Insurance Law Alert: Medical Malpractice Case of First Impression – Withdrawal Instruction

• In Wilson v. P.B. Patel, MD., P. C., et al, Plaintiff Wilson brought a medical malpractice lawsuit a doctor and his practice group. Plaintiff appealed a verdict in favor of the Defendants alleging that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to give a proposed withdrawal jury instruction regarding her alleged informed consent to the medical procedure.

• Insurance Law Alert: “Acceptance” Means Exactly That

• In Wilson v. Dura-Seal and Stripe, Inc., a school district hired Dura-Seal on an oral contract to construct an asphalt overlay of a drive lane near the auditorium of one of the district’s schools.

• Insurance Law Alert: Ambiguous Terms Favor the Insured

• In Maher Brothers, Inc. (Appellant) v. Quinn Pork, LLC (Quinn) and State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm), Appellant contracted with Quinn for daily care and management of Appellant’s pigs placed in Quinn’s facility.

• Insurance Law Alert: Status Check

• In Clayborne v. Enterprise Leasing Co. of St. Louis, et al, Carlus Parker (Appellant) rented a Ford Escape from Enterprise under a written rental agreement, declining to purchase insurance coverage from Enterprise and declining an option to purchase supplemental liability protection, which would have included excess insurance from a third party insurance company.

• Insurance Law Alert: New Law on Expert Witness Testimony in Missouri

• Missouri Governor Eric Greitens signed into law in late March a bill which will take effect August 28th in Missouri state courts.

• Insurance Law Alert: Read Carefully Before Applying

• In Owners Insurance Company v. Parkinson, et al., a car dealership provided a Ford Taurus as a loner car to an individual for use as a temporary vehicle while his vehicle was undergoing repairs. Later, the son of the individual to whom the car was loaned was driving the Taurus and was involved in a wreck. Several people in the other vehicle were injured and one individual died as a result of injuries sustained. The driver of the loaner car was determined to be at fault. Two passengers in the Taurus were also injured.

• Insurance Law Alert: Can Labor Costs be Depreciated? Round II

• The issue in Riggins v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. centered around the carrier’s decision to depreciate labor costs to a covered claim for storm damage to the insured’s residence.

• Insurance Law Alert: Garnishment Under Analysis

• In Franklin Allen v. Wayne Bryers, plaintiff Allen was injured in 2012 when defendant Bryers’ handgun discharged while removing Allen from an apartment complex. The gunshot severed Allen’s spinal cord, rendering him paraplegic. Bryers was never charged with any crime in connection with this incident. Allen sued Bryers and the apartment building for negligence in Circuit Court.

• Insurance Law Alert: Did the Insureds Misrepresent the Claim?

• In Neidenbach v. Amica Mutual Ins. Co., the Neidenbachs alleged that a fire caused significant damage to their house and personal property. They contend the insurance company refused to pay the claim whereas Amica concluded that the policy was void because of material misrepresentations made during the claim process.

• Insurance Law Alert: Duty to Defend – Proceed with Caution

• In the Doe Run Resources Corporation v. St. Paul Fire & Marine, et al., St. Paul appealed a trial court judgment which found that St. Paul had the duty to defend Doe Run in toxic tort lawsuits that underlie the appeal.

• Insurance Law Alert: Prompt Notice of Loss

• In the case of Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Pleasant Green Missionary Baptist Church, Pleasant Green owned a building located in St. Louis, and had an insurance policy on the building through Church Mutual which contained a cancellation and non-renewal clause as well as exclusions for concealment, misrepresentation or fraud. The policy also contained an exclusion for “wear and tear,” continuous or repeated seepage or leakage of water that occur over a period of 14 days or more, and exclusions for faulty, inadequate or defective design or construction.

• Insurance Law Alert: Can Labor Costs Be Depreciated?

• In Boss v. Traveler’s Home & Marine Insurance Co., the policy holder filed a claim with his homeowner’s insurance company for hail damage to the roof, gutters and deck of his house. Coverage was not in dispute.

• FURTHER UPDATE: Major Changes to the Uniform Straight Bill of Lading under the NMFC

• As we noted in our Transportation Law News Alerts on August 1 and 2, the National Motor Freight Traffic Association (NMFTA) made major changes to the Uniform Straight Bill of Lading (USBOL) terms and conditions as published in the National Motor Freight Classification (NMFC) and the related rules in NMFC Item 360-B. The changes are contained in Supplement 2 to NMFC 100-AP effective August 13, 2016.

• Insurance Law Alert: Condominium Association Prevails in Suit for Breach of Contract and Negligence

• In Hazelcrest III Condominium Association v. Bent, Hazelcrest obtained a judgment for breach of contract and negligence against the defendant in a case stemming from sewage backup that damaged two condominium units within the plaintiff’s complex.

• UPDATE: Major Changes to the Uniform Straight Bill of Lading Effective Aug. 13, 2016

• In addition to the changes to the NMFC Uniform Straight Bill of Lading noted in our Transportation Law News Alert on August 1, 2016, the NMFTA has also revised other provisions of the bill of lading terms and conditions.

• Transportation Law News Alert: Major Changes to the Uniform Straight Bill of Lading Effective Aug. 13, 2016

• The National Motor Freight Traffic Association has just made substantial changes to the terms and conditions of the Uniform Straight Bill of Lading to be effective on August 13, 2016. On July 14, 2016 the NMFTA issued Supplement 2 to the National Motor Freight Classification NMFC 100-AP. The key changes directly affect claims against trucking companies for lost or damaged cargo.

• Insurance Law Alert: Property Damage Occurred at Time of Purchase and Installation – Not When Damages Made Manifest

• In Kretsinger Real Estate Co. et al. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., American Central Transport Inc. (ACT) planned to build a parking lot in Clay County, Missouri. Kretsinger and ACT hired Triad Construction to construct the parking lot. Triad subcontracted with City Cement to supply labor and material. City Cement purchased concrete from Fordyce Concrete. Construction was completed in February 2007. In May 2008, Kretsinger and ACT became aware that the parking lot was beginning to crumble, crack and deteriorate.

• Insurance Law Alert: Misrepresentations Void Coverage

• In Neidenbach v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company, Dale and Kim Neidenbach filed a claim with their insurance company arising out of a fire in 2012. They that alleged they sustained a total loss to their home and personal belongings. The claim sought damages of approximately $375,000.00 to the dwelling and garage and personal property losses of approximately $262,500.00. Following this fire, Amica advanced the insureds a prepaid Visa card with $10,000.00 credit and also a check for $5,000.00, both for emergency expenses. Amica also expended money and resources for the investigation, adjustment, and evaluation of the insureds’ claim.

• Insurance Law Alert: No Renovation Equates To No Payment Due By Insurer

• In Park Reserve, LLC vs. Peerless Insurance Company, Peerless filed a motion for partial summary judgment arguing that a builder’s risk insurance policy issued to plaintiff did not provide coverage based on its clear and unambiguous terms.

• Insurance Law Alert: Spring Has Sprung (Almost)

• In Great Plains Ventures, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, the plaintiff owned several manufacturing companies. Liberty Mutual issued an insurance policy on Great Plains Ventures (GPV)’s covered buildings and other property located in Wichita, Kansas.

• Insurance Law Alert: MO Court of Appeals Addresses Coverage in Multiple Policies in Death and Injury Claims

• In Shelter Insurance Company v. Vasseur, et al, Shelter appealed from the trial court’s judgment against Shelter in a declaratory judgment matter, raising six points on appeal.

• Insurance Law Alert: Declaratory Judgment Denying Coverage in Suicide Attempt Following Fire

• In Roller v. American Modern Home Insurance Company, the insureds appealed the trial court’s declaratory judgment denying coverage for property damage to the Rollers’ garage caused by a fire started by Mr. Roller in a suicide attempt.

• Insurance Law Alert: Duty to Defend in Missouri Regarding Negligent Supervision Allegations

• In American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Parnell, et al., the insurer appealed the Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of M.S., a minor, by and through her next friend and mother. The trial court determined that two homeowner insurance policies issued to the Parnells provided coverage for M.S.’s claim of negligent supervision against the Parnells. On appeal, the insurer contended that the two exclusions applied to bar coverage and the concurrent proximate cause rule was not applicable.

• Insurance Law Alert: Kansas Supreme Court Rules on Children’s Disinheritance, Suspicious Circumstances

• Here is a case recently decided by the Kansas Supreme Court regarding two adult children’s disinheritance from their father’s will. They claimed that they were disinherited as a result of the inappropriate machinations of their stepmother and her daughter’s boyfriend, and that this meant they should keep their inheritance. The district court agreed, the Court of Appeals reversed that decision, and then the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals.

• Transportation Alert: SAFE HAUL

• On Friday, July 19, 2013, Representative Matt Cartwright (D-Penn) introduced House Bill 2730 which would raise the required insurance minimum for motor carriers.

• Transportation Alert: Flying J Class Action Settlement

• Please be aware that if you purchased fuel from a Pilot Flying J Travel Center, you may be eligible to participate in a class action lawsuit.

•  

• 700 W. 47 Street, Suite 410 Kansas City, MO 64112

• Phone: 816.931.2700 Fax: 816.931.7377

•   

• Disclaimer US Law Network

• Copyright © 2019, Dysart Taylor. All Rights Reserved.

• Our People Our Firm Our History Capabilities Contact Us

• Rapid Response Insights Newsletters Alerts Careers